Chinese vs Russian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Russian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Russians
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,595
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
62nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Russian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,248,059 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Russians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 6.8 Russians.
Chinese vs Russian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $53,154, a difference of 15.3%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $67,626, a difference of 14.5%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $63,939, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $116,328, a difference of 0.15%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $98,008, a difference of 0.50%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $120,487, a difference of 3.7%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Russian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $53,154 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $120,487 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $98,008 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $53,334 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $63,939 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $44,169 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $54,389 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $110,398 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $116,328 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $67,626 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 28.0% |
Chinese vs Russian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Russian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Fair 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 27.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Excellent 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Chinese vs Russian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 50.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Russian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chinese vs Russian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.58%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Russian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Poor 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Average 36.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Fair 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chinese vs Russian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.9%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.12, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Russian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 48.2% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.12 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Chinese vs Russian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.0%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 26.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Russian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Fair 54.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Poor 6.0% |
Chinese vs Russian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.6%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Russian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 94.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 70.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 53.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 45.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Chinese vs Russian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Russian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 45.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |