Kiowa vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,818,200 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.678. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.599% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 599.5 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $122,178, a difference of 63.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,776 compared to $119,756, a difference of 60.2%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $105,335, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 13.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $57,931, a difference of 29.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,140 compared to $69,174, a difference of 35.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 79.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 76.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 75.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 44.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 74.8%), single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.1%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.68%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (61.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 118.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 108.8%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 95.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 10th grade (93.9% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 99.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 77.3%), and hearing disability (4.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.8%).