Chinese vs Lebanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Lebanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Lebanese
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,328
SOCIAL INDEX
70.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
122nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Lebanese Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,965,962 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.057% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 56.8 Lebanese.
Chinese vs Lebanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,287, a difference of 24.4%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,355, a difference of 15.5%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $88,091, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,840, a difference of 0.56%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,409, a difference of 0.95%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,226, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $45,840 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $107,086 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Excellent $88,091 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $48,226 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $57,409 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Good $40,006 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $50,355 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Excellent $97,339 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $104,734 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Good $62,287 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.9% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 39.5%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.9%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 19.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Average 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Average 17.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 16.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Fair 29.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Good 11.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Excellent 11.1% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.4% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Poor 82.5% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (49.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 57.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Good 20.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Average 6.4% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 87.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 67.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 61.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 40.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), disability (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 11.5% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.4% |