Chinese vs Israeli Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Israeli
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Israelis
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,737
SOCIAL INDEX
64.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
145th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Israeli Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,641,299 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Israelis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 30.1 Israelis.
Chinese vs Israeli Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $66,636, a difference of 16.3%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $52,596, a difference of 14.1%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $63,228, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $114,186, a difference of 1.7%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $96,552, a difference of 2.0%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $118,577, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Israeli |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $52,596 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $118,577 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $96,552 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $52,937 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $63,228 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $43,852 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Average $52,335 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $107,579 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $114,186 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $66,636 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.4% |
Chinese vs Israeli Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 45.1%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.3%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 13.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Israeli |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Fair 12.5% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Good 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Fair 11.5% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Average 13.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Excellent 16.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 15.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 15.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Average 12.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Poor 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Chinese vs Israeli Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Israeli |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Chinese vs Israeli Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 19.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.85%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Israeli |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Good 65.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Fair 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 32.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 72.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Fair 82.7% |
Chinese vs Israeli Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.1%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Israeli |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 63.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Good 46.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Chinese vs Israeli Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 69.2%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 51.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 42.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Israeli |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 87.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 51.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Chinese vs Israeli Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 55.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 54.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Israeli |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Excellent 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 70.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 53.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Chinese vs Israeli Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.6%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Israeli |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.4% |