Chinese vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,941,069 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 30.1 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $51,393, a difference of 50.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $77,850, a difference of 49.2%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $66,768, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 19.5%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $34,317, a difference of 20.8%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $39,169, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 88.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 88.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 84.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 37.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.2%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 57.2%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households (68.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 68.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 62.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.5%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 29.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.010%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.6%).