Chinese vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,616,624 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.572% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 572.3 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,089, a difference of 20.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $106,109, a difference of 9.5%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $106,252, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,558, a difference of 2.2%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,671, a difference of 2.4%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $55,241, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 35.0%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.2%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 44.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.39%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.36, a difference of 0.51%), and family households (68.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.6%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 96.6%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.4%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.72%).