Chinese vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,304,624 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.722. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.230% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 229.9 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,089, a difference of 38.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $90,811, a difference of 27.9%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $90,918, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,783, a difference of 12.3%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,629, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 75.8%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 66.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 63.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.71%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.2%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.7%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 42.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.43, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.98%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 116.4%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 36.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.15%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%).