Chinese vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,361,457 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.376% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 376.2 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,512, a difference of 42.1%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $71,801, a difference of 37.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $85,207, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $36,017, a difference of 15.1%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $41,325, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 69.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 68.5%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 12.2%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 43.4%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 25.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 73.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 42.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%).