Chinese vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,145,990 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.156% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 155.9 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $60,748, a difference of 27.5%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $79,509, a difference of 23.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $93,991, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,000, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,202, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 70.1%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 59.8%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 17.6%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 148.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 90.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 67.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 77.6%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 43.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.0%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 111.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 31.0%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 157.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.6%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.3%).