Chinese vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,271,348 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 24.4 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,474, a difference of 42.2%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $92,231, a difference of 26.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $92,554, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $53,275, a difference of 9.2%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $36,904, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 83.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 83.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.36, a difference of 0.62%), family households (68.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.3%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 99.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.96%).