Hawaiian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,782,371 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 15.4 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $54,264, a difference of 37.7%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $67,353, a difference of 33.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,722 compared to $119,756, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $69,174, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $57,931, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 35.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.96%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and male poverty (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.1%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (67.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 88.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 111.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 95.4%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 41.8%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.9%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.0%).