Chinese vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,690,797 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 54.6 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,521, a difference of 20.1%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,729, a difference of 14.6%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $91,887, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,183, a difference of 0.68%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,682, a difference of 1.7%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,938, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 79.9%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 45.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.4%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.3%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 19.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.73%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.24%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.6%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.0%).