Chinese vs Vietnamese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Vietnamese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chinese

Vietnamese

Exceptional
Fair
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,448
SOCIAL INDEX
22.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
257th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Vietnamese Integration in Chinese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,104,456 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.418. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.117% in Vietnamese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 116.8 Vietnamese.
Chinese Integration in Vietnamese Communities

Chinese vs Vietnamese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,143, a difference of 38.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $93,788, a difference of 23.8%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,377, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $56,127, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,172, a difference of 5.8%).
Chinese vs Vietnamese Income
Income MetricChineseVietnamese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,098
Poor
$42,368
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,188
Tragic
$96,123
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,496
Poor
$82,248
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,836
Average
$46,172
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,872
Poor
$52,525
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,461
Excellent
$40,377
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,162
Exceptional
$56,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,264
Fair
$92,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,156
Tragic
$93,788
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,465
Tragic
$56,143
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.9%
Exceptional
21.0%

Chinese vs Vietnamese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 103.6%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 76.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.9%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 25.4%).
Chinese vs Vietnamese Poverty
Poverty MetricChineseVietnamese
Poverty
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.0%
Families
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
19.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.6%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
15.7%

Chinese vs Vietnamese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 52.1%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.7%).
Chinese vs Vietnamese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChineseVietnamese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.5%

Chinese vs Vietnamese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 30.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chinese vs Vietnamese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChineseVietnamese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Tragic
29.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Tragic
80.8%

Chinese vs Vietnamese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.1%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.90%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Chinese vs Vietnamese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChineseVietnamese
Family Households
Exceptional
68.1%
Average
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.4%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
6.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Excellent
30.2%

Chinese vs Vietnamese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 219.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 128.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 91.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 24.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 56.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 91.7%).
Chinese vs Vietnamese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChineseVietnamese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
26.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
73.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Tragic
38.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
12.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
3.9%

Chinese vs Vietnamese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 115.6%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chinese vs Vietnamese Education Level
Education Level MetricChineseVietnamese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
93.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
93.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
90.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Tragic
89.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
87.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
85.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
61.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
57.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Average
1.9%

Chinese vs Vietnamese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 54.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.81%, a difference of 40.5%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Chinese vs Vietnamese Disability
Disability MetricChineseVietnamese
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.81%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%