Chinese vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,109,375 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $70,146, a difference of 23.3%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $56,709, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $128,140, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $62,083, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $71,567, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 41.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.3%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 37.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 83.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.3%), male disability (12.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.5%).