Chickasaw vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from China
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,198,236 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.246. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 30.6 Immigrants from China.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $119,756, a difference of 53.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $105,335, a difference of 50.5%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $54,264, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $69,174, a difference of 28.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $57,931, a difference of 29.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Poor 26.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 60.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 51.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.70%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 47.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.47%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 92.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Poor 6.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 104.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 100.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 85.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.95%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 85.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 80.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.7%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |