Immigrants from Haiti vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,905,308 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Haiti communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.281. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Haiti within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Haiti corresponds to a decrease of 19.5 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,391 compared to $119,756, a difference of 50.8%), median family income ($84,018 compared to $125,540, a difference of 49.4%), and median male earnings ($45,266 compared to $67,353, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,398 compared to $57,931, a difference of 14.9%), median female earnings ($36,203 compared to $46,972, a difference of 29.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,219 compared to $69,174, a difference of 35.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 90.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 57.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.0%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 35.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 65.9%), births to unmarried women (38.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 57.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.97%), and average family size (3.39 compared to 3.23, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (46.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.32%), no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (46.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 145.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 99.6%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 79.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.48%), 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 29.9%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.8%).