Chinese vs Immigrants from Denmark Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,481,166 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from Denmark. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 15.4 Immigrants from Denmark.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $53,799, a difference of 16.7%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $64,625, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $68,801, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($98,496 compared to $98,510, a difference of 0.010%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $116,000, a difference of 0.13%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $120,445, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and single female poverty (16.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in family households (68.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 8.4%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.8%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.8%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 56.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.0%).