Chinese vs Immigrants from Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,657,432 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.137% in Immigrants from Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 136.9 Immigrants from Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,828, a difference of 19.5%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $50,950, a difference of 10.5%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $62,057, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $115,523, a difference of 0.58%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $106,817, a difference of 2.5%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $95,032, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.4%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.6%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in family households (68.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 6.9%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.6%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 52.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.8%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.54%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.65%).