Chinese vs Greek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,434,113 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Greeks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 18.8 Greeks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Greek communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $65,306, a difference of 18.6%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $53,715, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $115,192, a difference of 0.86%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $106,457, a difference of 2.1%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,336, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Greek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.9%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.44%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and male poverty (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Greek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 59.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Greek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Greek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.1%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.14, a difference of 6.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.5%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Greek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Greek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.9%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Greek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.6%).