Chinese vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,112,797 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.317. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 20.1 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,797, a difference of 25.4%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $49,267, a difference of 18.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $85,053, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $47,284, a difference of 2.6%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $55,380, a difference of 2.7%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,060, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 60.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 56.3%), and single female poverty (16.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.7%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 44.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.6%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.14, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 63.6%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 60.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.53%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.8%).