Chinese vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,812,821 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.700. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 26.6 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,163, a difference of 43.0%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $90,266, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,261, a difference of 0.49%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,846, a difference of 6.5%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $42,406, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 76.6%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 74.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 72.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.6%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 43.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 53.1%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 217.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 126.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 89.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 24.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 56.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 89.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.3%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 56.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.84%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.7%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.4%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%).