Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chinese

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Exceptional
Average
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,212
SOCIAL INDEX
59.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
160th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Integration in Chinese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,442,734 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.298% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 297.9 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Communities

Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $55,986, a difference of 38.4%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $79,888, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $94,288, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,886, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,600, a difference of 7.1%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Income
Income MetricChineseImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,098
Poor
$42,278
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,188
Tragic
$97,432
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,496
Tragic
$79,888
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,836
Fair
$45,600
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,872
Poor
$52,869
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,461
Poor
$38,886
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,162
Tragic
$50,565
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,264
Tragic
$88,819
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,156
Tragic
$94,288
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,465
Tragic
$55,986
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.9%
Exceptional
24.8%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 38.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 38.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.1%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty
Poverty MetricChineseImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Poverty
Exceptional
9.5%
Good
12.0%
Families
Exceptional
6.5%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
13.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Average
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Fair
16.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.1%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.6%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Good
11.3%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 45.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.13%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.74%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChineseImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.89%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChineseImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
66.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Exceptional
86.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Exceptional
83.3%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.29%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.15, a difference of 6.0%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChineseImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Family Households
Exceptional
68.1%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.4%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Fair
46.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Excellent
30.3%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 65.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 36.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.9%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChineseImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Good
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
17.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.3%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.2%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Education Level
Education Level MetricChineseImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Excellent
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Average
37.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Fair
14.3%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.7%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.45%), disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Disability
Disability MetricChineseImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Average
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%