Chinese vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,636,399 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.959. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.334% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 334.1 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,339, a difference of 37.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $88,115, a difference of 31.8%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $75,839, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.9%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $42,111, a difference of 16.0%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,498, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 43.3%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 42.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.1%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 132.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.21, a difference of 4.1%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.8%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.2%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.5%).