Chinese vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,039,672 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.441. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.119% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 119.5 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,837, a difference of 29.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $97,284, a difference of 19.4%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,289, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,257, a difference of 3.0%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,564, a difference of 4.9%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $53,457, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 52.6%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 52.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.3%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 58.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 52.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 36.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 63.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.0%), female disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.7%).