Chinese vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,203,772 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 61.4 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $74,031, a difference of 30.2%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $57,742, a difference of 25.3%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $61,151, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $77,051, a difference of 0.54%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $59,424, a difference of 2.2%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (16.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 31.4%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 0.16%), currently married (49.5% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 81.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 58.5%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.7%), male disability (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.0%).