Chinese vs Salvadoran Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,235,755 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.275% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 275.2 Salvadorans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,141, a difference of 31.0%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $94,109, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $94,842, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $55,412, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $37,083, a difference of 11.8%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 78.8%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 64.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.4%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 51.3%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 47.5%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 45.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.48, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 154.2%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.0%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.35%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.1%).