Chinese vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,594,478 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.061% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 61.4 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $87,864, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $75,574, a difference of 30.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $80,544, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,691, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,477, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 54.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 51.1%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 20.7%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.9%).