Chinese vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,710,382 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.771. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.141% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 140.6 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,737, a difference of 44.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $87,255, a difference of 33.1%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $74,279, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $36,408, a difference of 13.9%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $42,430, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 68.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 66.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.2%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 31.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 38.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 57.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (68.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.9%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 39.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.6%).