Chinese vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,982,690 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 6.0 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $65,497, a difference of 18.3%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $62,121, a difference of 9.2%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $49,983, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $115,880, a difference of 0.27%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $96,292, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 36.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.3%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.5%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 65.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 58.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.3%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.4%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 5.0%).