Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 300,054,964 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.411. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 7.5 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($78,249 compared to $125,540, a difference of 60.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,701 compared to $119,756, a difference of 56.1%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $54,264, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $57,931, a difference of 15.0%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 19.4%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $46,972, a difference of 41.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 117.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 56.2%), and married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 68.0%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 51.7%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (68.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 74.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 162.4%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 95.1%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 87.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.4%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.5%).