Chinese vs Bermudan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Bermudan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Bermudans
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,838
SOCIAL INDEX
25.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
241st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bermudan Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,180,470 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.743. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 54.0 Bermudans.
Chinese vs Bermudan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,171, a difference of 33.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $94,197, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $47,359, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,418, a difference of 5.2%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,593, a difference of 7.1%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $42,911, a difference of 7.4%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Bermudan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Fair $42,911 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $97,577 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $80,406 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Fair $45,593 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Poor $52,465 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Fair $39,418 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $47,359 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $88,231 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $94,197 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $58,171 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 23.1% |
Chinese vs Bermudan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 52.7%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 51.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.0%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 23.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Bermudan |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 9.9% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 21.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 18.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Chinese vs Bermudan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 51.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Bermudan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Poor 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.1% |
Chinese vs Bermudan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Bermudan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Excellent 83.1% |
Chinese vs Bermudan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.0%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Bermudan |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 42.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 43.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 35.5% |
Chinese vs Bermudan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 57.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 55.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Bermudan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 87.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 50.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Chinese vs Bermudan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.9%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Bermudan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Good 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Good 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Average 91.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Average 85.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Average 65.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Average 59.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Average 46.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Good 15.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Average 1.8% |
Chinese vs Bermudan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.49%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.82%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Bermudan |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Excellent 46.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |