Armenian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 294,649,390 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Armenian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Armenians corresponds to a decrease of 20.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,248 compared to $119,756, a difference of 16.0%), median male earnings ($58,134 compared to $67,353, a difference of 15.9%), and median household income ($91,807 compared to $105,335, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,179 compared to $57,931, a difference of 8.9%), and median female earnings ($42,212 compared to $46,972, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 16.5%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.98%), single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.2%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and births to unmarried women (26.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.55%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.58%), and currently married (46.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 61.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.1%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and 6th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.6%).