Immigrants from Belize vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,665,199 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Belize communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belize within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.496% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belize corresponds to a decrease of 496.0 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,141 compared to $119,756, a difference of 44.0%), median male earnings ($47,809 compared to $67,353, a difference of 40.9%), and median family income ($89,197 compared to $125,540, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,223 compared to $57,931, a difference of 13.1%), wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and median female earnings ($37,056 compared to $46,972, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 59.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 53.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 52.4%), births to unmarried women (37.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 51.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.23%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.39 compared to 3.23, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (49.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.2%), no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.31%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 132.4%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 94.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 75.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 36.4%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.2%).