Liberian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Liberian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Liberians

Immigrants from China

Poor
Good
1,824
SOCIAL INDEX
15.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
286th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Liberian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,018,832 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Liberian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.281. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Liberians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Liberians corresponds to a decrease of 48.4 Immigrants from China.
Liberian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Liberian vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,005 compared to $119,756, a difference of 46.0%), per capita income ($38,780 compared to $54,264, a difference of 39.9%), and median household income ($75,667 compared to $105,335, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,917 compared to $57,931, a difference of 18.4%), median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $46,972, a difference of 22.9%), and wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 24.5%).
Liberian vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricLiberianImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,780
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,722
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,667
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,536
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,318
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,215
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,917
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,005
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,929
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,356
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.4%
Poor
26.7%

Liberian vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 54.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 48.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Liberian vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricLiberianImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.6%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Excellent
16.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.6%

Liberian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Liberian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLiberianImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Liberian vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 34.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Liberian vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLiberianImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.8%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Liberian vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 70.8%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 51.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.67%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (62.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Liberian vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLiberianImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
62.0%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.3%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.4%
Exceptional
24.7%

Liberian vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
Liberian vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLiberianImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.7%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
6.0%

Liberian vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 103.1%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 89.5%), and master's degree (12.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Liberian vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricLiberianImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.8%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.7%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.3%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
3.1%

Liberian vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 48.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 32.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.9%).
Liberian vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricLiberianImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%