Chinese vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,294,242 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 33.5 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,957, a difference of 21.1%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $53,185, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $106,611, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,973, a difference of 0.18%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,504, a difference of 0.68%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,459, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 39.4%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.0%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 42.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (68.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.3%).