Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Immigrants from China
7,168
SOCIAL INDEX
69.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
129th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Ethiopia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,467,860 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Ethiopia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.439. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ethiopia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.098% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ethiopia corresponds to a decrease of 98.5 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,256 compared to $119,756, a difference of 25.7%), wage/income gap (21.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and median male earnings ($55,434 compared to $67,353, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,238 compared to $69,174, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,408 compared to $57,931, a difference of 8.5%), and median female earnings ($42,744 compared to $46,972, a difference of 9.9%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from China |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,923 | Exceptional $54,264 |
| Median Family Income | Excellent $106,969 | Exceptional $125,540 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,687 | Exceptional $105,335 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,924 | Exceptional $56,638 |
| Median Male Earnings | Good $55,434 | Exceptional $67,353 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,744 | Exceptional $46,972 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,408 | Exceptional $57,931 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,256 | Exceptional $119,756 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,763 | Exceptional $122,178 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,238 | Exceptional $69,174 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.6% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.29%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from China |
| Poverty | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Males | Average 11.2% | Excellent 10.7% |
| Females | Good 13.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.2% | Average 20.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.6% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Excellent 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from China |
| Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.3% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Good 17.5% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Fair 10.4% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.4% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.2% |
| Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (69.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from China |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.4% | Excellent 65.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 82.1% | Good 79.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 31.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Tragic 71.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Average 84.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.0%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.68%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (61.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from China |
| Family Households | Tragic 61.2% | Excellent 64.7% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Average 27.4% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.1% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.7% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 45.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from China |
| No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Tragic 84.9% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.0% | Tragic 51.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.2% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.2%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.0%), and master's degree (17.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 8th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from China |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.5% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 96.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 95.0% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 94.3% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
| 11th Grade | Poor 92.1% | Fair 92.3% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Good 91.3% |
| High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Good 89.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Exceptional 86.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.0% | Exceptional 70.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.6% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.1% | Exceptional 55.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.9% | Exceptional 21.2% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from China |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 0.96% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Exceptional 46.3% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |