Chinese vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,448,893 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 8.4 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $40,550, a difference of 91.0%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $54,644, a difference of 80.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $65,113, a difference of 78.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 21.5%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $32,500, a difference of 27.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $36,876, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 168.9%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 161.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 159.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 75.6%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 84.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 92.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 127.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 102.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 84.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 76.3%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 59.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.74%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 81.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 71.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 65.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 15.4%).