Chinese vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,775,021 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 10.8 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,847, a difference of 43.9%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $70,539, a difference of 39.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $83,943, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 3.7%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,003, a difference of 18.4%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $40,287, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 79.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 76.7%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.1%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 41.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 43.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 96.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 70.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 56.7%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 54.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.8%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (68.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.9%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.7%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 51.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.61%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 8.5%).