Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,793,262 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.152% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to a decrease of 151.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,372 compared to $54,264, a difference of 37.8%), median male earnings ($49,215 compared to $67,353, a difference of 36.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,751 compared to $119,756, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $57,931, a difference of 8.7%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,474 compared to $69,174, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 68.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 40.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 6.4%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.74%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 48.3%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 43.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (67.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 57.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 105.8%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 70.9%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 19.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.24%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.2%).