Yuman vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yuman
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yuman

Immigrants from China

Tragic
Good
959
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
331st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Yuman Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,865,189 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Yuman communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yuman within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yuman corresponds to a decrease of 49.4 Immigrants from China.
Yuman Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Yuman vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,956 compared to $119,756, a difference of 64.1%), per capita income ($33,236 compared to $54,264, a difference of 63.3%), and median family income ($78,055 compared to $125,540, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,933 compared to $57,931, a difference of 13.7%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,110 compared to $69,174, a difference of 30.2%).
Yuman vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricYumanImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,236
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$78,055
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$68,743
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,523
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,446
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,377
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,933
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,956
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,139
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,110
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Poor
26.7%

Yuman vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (30.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 125.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (28.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 118.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (29.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 117.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 18.8%).
Yuman vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricYumanImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
19.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.0%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
28.9%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.7%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
9.6%

Yuman vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (16.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 283.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (14.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 134.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (37.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 114.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.7%).
Yuman vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYumanImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
9.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
8.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
9.6%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
37.4%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
15.8%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
9.5%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Yuman vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (74.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (27.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (70.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 9.0%).
Yuman vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYumanImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
71.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.3%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.3%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.3%
Exceptional
83.2%

Yuman vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 90.4%), births to unmarried women (44.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 79.8%), and single father households (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 7.1%), average family size (3.47 compared to 3.23, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.4%).
Yuman vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYumanImmigrants from China
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.47
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
24.7%

Yuman vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (85.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Yuman vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYumanImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.5%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.7%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.9%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Poor
6.0%

Yuman vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 129.4%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 105.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 101.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.14%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Yuman vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricYumanImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.7%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
86.5%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.0%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
55.1%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
3.1%

Yuman vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (10.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 93.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 81.7%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.0%).
Yuman vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricYumanImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
31.5%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.4%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%