Chinese vs Immigrants from Panama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,452,694 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.462. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Immigrants from Panama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 32.2 Immigrants from Panama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,944, a difference of 36.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $93,815, a difference of 23.8%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $80,873, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,049, a difference of 6.2%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,198, a difference of 8.1%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $51,962, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 58.4%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 54.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.0%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.6%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 38.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.0%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 78.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 34.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.17%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.0%).