French American Indian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,598,598 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.365. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.304% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 304.2 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $119,756, a difference of 39.4%), median household income ($76,387 compared to $105,335, a difference of 37.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $122,178, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $57,931, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $69,174, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 53.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 43.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.22%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 47.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 48.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.1%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (62.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 45.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 95.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 79.0%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 57.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 49.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.5%).