Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Bahamian
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Bahamians
Immigrants from China
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Bahamian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,510,010 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to a decrease of 24.4 Immigrants from China.
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,395 compared to $119,756, a difference of 58.8%), median family income ($82,631 compared to $125,540, a difference of 51.9%), and median household income ($69,726 compared to $105,335, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,743 compared to $57,931, a difference of 26.7%), wage/income gap (20.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $46,972, a difference of 33.7%).
Income Metric | Bahamian | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,427 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,631 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,726 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,735 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,756 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,125 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,743 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $75,395 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $81,369 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,000 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.2% | Poor 26.7% |
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 77.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 68.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 20.0%).
Poverty Metric | Bahamian | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.6% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.8% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Bahamian | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.1% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.6% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Bahamian | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.4% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 65.2%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 63.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Bahamian | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.28 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.8% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 53.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Bahamian | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.1% | Poor 6.0% |
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 111.0%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 82.8%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
Education Level Metric | Bahamian | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 36.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%).
Disability Metric | Bahamian | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |