Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bahamians

Immigrants from China

Tragic
Good
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Bahamian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,510,010 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to a decrease of 24.4 Immigrants from China.
Bahamian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,395 compared to $119,756, a difference of 58.8%), median family income ($82,631 compared to $125,540, a difference of 51.9%), and median household income ($69,726 compared to $105,335, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,743 compared to $57,931, a difference of 26.7%), wage/income gap (20.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $46,972, a difference of 33.7%).
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricBahamianImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,427
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,631
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,726
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,735
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,756
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,125
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,743
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$75,395
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,369
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,000
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.2%
Poor
26.7%

Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 77.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 68.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 20.0%).
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricBahamianImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
9.6%

Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBahamianImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.1%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBahamianImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
83.2%

Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 65.2%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 63.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBahamianImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.28
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.2%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.8%
Exceptional
24.7%

Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 53.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.5%).
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBahamianImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
6.0%

Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 111.0%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 82.8%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricBahamianImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Poor
95.7%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.3%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
3.1%

Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 36.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%).
Bahamian vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricBahamianImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%