Creek vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Creek
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Creek
Immigrants from China
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Creek Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,936,418 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 11.2 Immigrants from China.
Creek vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $119,756, a difference of 60.0%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $105,335, a difference of 55.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $122,178, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $57,931, a difference of 27.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $69,174, a difference of 33.2%).
Income Metric | Creek | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,546 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,560 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,715 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,648 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,594 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,437 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,371 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,847 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $78,960 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,949 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Poor 26.7% |
Creek vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 78.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 71.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.1%).
Poverty Metric | Creek | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.2% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Creek vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Creek | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Creek vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 25.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Creek | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.3% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.1% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.7% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.0% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.7% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Creek vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 52.2%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.22%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.91%).
Family Structure Metric | Creek | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Poor 46.0% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.6% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Creek vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 94.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Creek | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Poor 6.0% |
Creek vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 129.3%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 117.3%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 101.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.98%).
Education Level Metric | Creek | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.2% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Creek vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 94.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.7%).
Disability Metric | Creek | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.4% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |