Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Immigrants from China
3,479
SOCIAL INDEX
32.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
219th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 418,568,739 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to a decrease of 25.6 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $119,756, a difference of 32.5%), median household income ($83,289 compared to $105,335, a difference of 26.5%), and per capita income ($42,950 compared to $54,264, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $57,931, a difference of 14.5%), wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $69,174, a difference of 15.6%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Fair $42,950 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,256 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,289 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,564 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,457 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,257 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,609 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $90,372 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $97,284 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,837 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.2% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 36.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 35.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.92%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.0% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Poor 21.5% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.4% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.26%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.4% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 43.9%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.57%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (62.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Tragic 62.4% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.25 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.9% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.0% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 21.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.56%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.6% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.8% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 57.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.5%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.1% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.3% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.6% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Good 46.8% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.7% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.3% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |