Chinese vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,454,356 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.231. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.550% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 550.4 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($98,496 compared to $76,383, a difference of 28.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $90,951, a difference of 27.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,330, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.53%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $37,905, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,713, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 74.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 67.1%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 17.4%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 22.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 113.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 109.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 100.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 71.2%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households (68.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 89.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 33.4%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.11%), 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.6%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.5%).