Chinese vs Immigrants from Albania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,644,775 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Albania within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.142% in Immigrants from Albania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 141.8 Immigrants from Albania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $57,828, a difference of 34.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $101,957, a difference of 13.9%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,534, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,179, a difference of 0.54%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,387, a difference of 0.63%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,377, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 50.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 11.6%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.3%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and family households (68.1% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.29%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 115.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 71.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 30.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 57.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.4%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.9%).