Ugandan vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,466,418 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to a decrease of 69.4 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,667 compared to $119,756, a difference of 23.9%), median male earnings ($55,290 compared to $67,353, a difference of 21.8%), and per capita income ($45,047 compared to $54,264, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 10.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $69,174, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $57,931, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 32.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 28.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.39%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 56.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.16%), and family households (61.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 38.7%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.5%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.27%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.060%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.0%).