Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,983,020 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,114 compared to $125,540, a difference of 32.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $119,756, a difference of 30.8%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $67,353, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $57,931, a difference of 7.5%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $46,972, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 55.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 42.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.5%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.2%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 34.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.39%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 50.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 111.6%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 71.7%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.6%).