Chinese vs Uruguayan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Uruguayan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Uruguayans
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Uruguayan Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,901,445 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.123% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 123.4 Uruguayans.
Chinese vs Uruguayan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,090, a difference of 31.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $98,660, a difference of 17.7%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $84,691, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 3.0%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $44,318, a difference of 4.0%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,228, a difference of 5.7%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Uruguayan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Good $44,318 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Fair $100,656 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Average $84,691 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Average $46,190 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Fair $53,680 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Fair $39,228 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Good $52,465 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Fair $93,631 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Fair $98,660 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Poor $59,090 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Excellent 25.2% |
Chinese vs Uruguayan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 49.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 15.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Uruguayan |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Fair 9.1% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Fair 13.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 16.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Good 16.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Average 11.8% |
Chinese vs Uruguayan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Uruguayan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Chinese vs Uruguayan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.67%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Uruguayan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Good 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Excellent 83.1% |
Chinese vs Uruguayan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.3%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Uruguayan |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Poor 45.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Poor 33.1% |
Chinese vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 57.2%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 37.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Uruguayan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 88.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 52.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Chinese vs Uruguayan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.9%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.090%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Uruguayan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 90.4% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 88.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Poor 64.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Fair 58.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Average 46.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Good 38.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Chinese vs Uruguayan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Uruguayan |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |